https://www.flotrack.org/articles/5024592-track-and-the-nfl-whos-the-fastest-ever

If you look at the list you’ll see some talented football players who had great speed. For instance I don’t think of OJ Simpson as being just fast, he was durable and hard to tackle as well. Bo Jackson was just an unreal athlete,

I’ve been assured on this forum or it’s predecessor that times for 100 meters are not meaningful in football; pay no attention to all the sprinters in the football hall of fame.
But I often check. Most fast HS football players run track at least some years, and their times are easily found on the Internet. We usually have had a few guys who run sub 11 seconds. It’s good when those guys have some size as is the case here.

I don’t think hiring Gould caused Tumeys falling out of favor. It was too early in Gould’s tenure.

Neither he nor they said he was fired, they don’t like the word.
The chancellor announced it, which kind of implies it was her decision.
They likely gave him a good reference as they waved goodbye.

Why did he leave here? I guess it wasn’t because he didn’t like the Valley.

Movie
I think we all agree we won’t be much better without defensive improvement. I’m optimistic. Look at linebacker for instance. You list five solid junior linebackers; in addition we’ve got senior Baumgart and Moe. Trimble, Terrell Sayles who once started games for us, and Logan Hungrige who was reportedly offered by all the service acadamies, coming off redshirt years. Plus sophomore Airey. Hopefully the cream will rise to the top and we’ll have four or five solid linebackers. Same with other defensive positions. You mention Perryman, a redshirt 6 ft player with 4.4 speed. Might really add something. We’ll have some new faces and holdovers will have won their jobs against competition. I’m optimistic, not that we’ll suddenly be like Weber on D, but that we’ll be much improved.

Saying San Jose state is an automatic loss is idiotic.
We have usually had competitive games with San Jose. They are a team that is up and down coming off a horrible year. Their new coaching staff hasn’t proved anything yet. FCS teams beat teams at San Jose’s level all the time.

I’m hopeful we’ll be better incrementally in all the defensive categories. Also hopeful we’ll have a running game and cut down on sacks. I think being picked to be third in the Big Sky is not unrealistic. We’ll see.

I think the teams ranking on defense, as well as what we saw in some games has to be eye opening for the coaches. I don't think they are going into this season with complacency, and surely they are looking at what needs to be changed, both in who plays and what the schemes are.. I think our defense last year was less than the sum of its parts. But we have added some new parts in the guys coming off redshirt years and some good freshmen, I think our additions exceed our losses, We'll see if we rank in the 100s next year. I expect we won't, time will tell.

I’m looking forward to hearing who rises to the top among the guys you mention and others. Gould’s last class was heavy in front seven guys, some of those guys are just sophomores. We brought in some last year and a couple of good ones this year. As others have stated just improving to middle ranking on defense would improve our record. Some have stressed turnovers but any way we can get the ball back including on downs so that we aren’t blown out before our offense breaks a sweat would be great. Looks like we might have depth If a couple of guys step up. Strength in numbers, no name defense kind of D. Lots of room to improve but the cupboard isn’t bare.

If last years teams played, we'd be projected to lose to Stanford by about 5 touchdowns, San Diego would be even, and we'd beat San Jose by a touchdown.
Doesn't answer the question for next years teams, but no better answer exists. San Jose might be better next year, who knows? But it looks to be our most likely early win.

I don’t think San Jose would be in anyone’s poll.
San Diego gets no respect,
Stanford isn’t as up and down as they used to be unfortunately.

Nowhere to go but up!
While retuning a lot of starters from a ineffective unit is a mixed blessing; at most positions our worst case scenario is as good as last year but more experienced . Also, the coaches now have more experience with the conference and team. Plus we have a lot of players we haven’t seen coming off redshirt freshmen years and new recruits. We lost some good football players on D but their replacements are likely to be more athletic, for example at inside linebacker. Basically counting on the coaches to get more out of our D, which I think is a realistic expectation. I could be crazy.

Defense is returning 80% of players on the two deep, plus a ton of redshirts plus a few promising freshmen. We will see if the coaches can put something together, they have pieces to work with.

We don’t have many question marks on offense. 22nd and third in our conference is not too high.
I think we are nearly back to being as good as we were in 2005, although the defense needs to show improvement to say that. I expect we will see a better defense.

Not much information came out of spring camp.
The defensive coordinator said that players were moved to new positions and that they simplified coverages for the new guys so they could play fast, so there are new guys coming off their redshirt year who will be factors, but no names mentioned.
We return 80+% of the guys on the defense depth chart.
Here are the guys returning, not counting redshirts. I'm just listing it to show we have an unusually large returning group; not counting redshirts, who are numerous.
The list is from our defense depth chart for the last game, so this is their class status as of this 2017-18:
DE 96 Hunter O’BRION 6-5 280 Jr.
DT 91 Nick FEHRENBACH 6-0 235
71 De’Andre MORGAN 6-3 260 Fr.
99 Bryce RODGERS 6-3 285 So.
NT 57 Terrell CLOUD 6-0 290 Jr.
94 Jordan FRANKLIN 6-1 285 So.
97 Andrew WILSON 6-2 300 RFr. .
RE 6 Anthony BAUMGART 6-1 240 Jr.
48 Brandon JAMISON 6-3 235 So.
SLB 36 Connor AIREY 6-0 215 RFr.
34 Mason MOE 6-0 210 Jr. Human Dev.
MLB 33 Quincy BENNETT 6-4 240 So.
42 Christian LEOTA 6-2 250 So.
WLB 11 Nas ANESI 6-2 225 So.
45 Eric FLOWERS 6-1 228 So.
CB 31 Desmond LEWIS 6-0 175 Sr.
5 Isiah OLAVE 5-10 190 Jr. Int.
16 Erron DUNCAN 5-9 190 RFr.
S 39 Tiger GARCIA 6-3 181 So.
26 Josh JANUSKA 5-9 179 So.
28 Ryan PARENTEAU 6-2 200 Jr.
CB 1 Isaiah THOMAS 5-9 170 RFr.
23 Jaylin WHITE 5-10 158 Fr.
20 Vincent WHITE 6-0 187 Jr.

I hope Moore’s not transferring to UCLA.
Just kidding.

Article on official site about the game. Plough comments on players who made strides. Tucker mentions no one. Plough mentioned Tehran so even though he wasn’t mentioned elsewhere is still around. Harrell stood out, which is promising.
I don’t see Aaron Moore on roster. He did a good job last fall.

If you watched later Stanford games in 2005 they had a 260lb fullback named Nick Frank who was unstoppable, Larry Csonka like. I watched the Stanford UCLA game that year that Stanford lost in overtime, and tackling him was like tackling a whale.
In our game he had 3 carries!! for 17yards. And this in a game where they lose their starting QB early. Is that bad coaching or what?

I think Hunter Rodrigues is the only local QB, not counting walkons. He’s a American River College transfer just a sophomore next season
Movie, time will tell whether D is improved; but I think we will be. I like that the players were quoted that they are trying to be disruptive vs being a containment type defense. I think the underclassmen, redshirts and perhaps a freshman or two will end up being better than the guys we lost to graduation; and the returning starters will be more seasoned. There are many guys who were recruited in the last three years on D that are going to get their chance; I hope we are a lot better,
If you look at our game notes depth chart from end of season we’re not losing anyone who is going to be hard to replace with guys already here. We’ll have some newcomers who will win some spots.