Aggie Sports Talk

  • Aggie Sports Talk
  • Blog
  • Members

  • MBB: UC Davis (0-0, 0-0) vs. Cal (0-0, 0-0) Mon. Nov. 7, 8 PM @ Berkeley
    Great aggressiveness on the boards and defense. Not perfect, but holding up really well even while mismatched.

    It's like the shooting talent of the Corey Hawkins era team has been pasted on to the scrappy defensive teams after that
  • Week 10: Idaho State (1-7) @ UC Davis (4-4)
    Held in the end but it is concerning how easy Bengals made it look for most of the drive.
  • Week 10: Idaho State (1-7) @ UC Davis (4-4)
    32 is a 5-TD lead less an opposing team FG. Actually a relatively likely score differential given how the Aggie offense and defense alike have performed against weaker teams these days.

    Edit: Whoops, missed the second page of replies with multiple people getting there before me
  • Week 10: Big Sky Schedule and Scores
    I don't agree with Weber beating Sac being good for us or even mattering that much for playoff purposes.

    Best case for us I think is Idaho and Sac winning every remaining game other than when we beat them. Second best scenario is us beating a really good Idaho, losing close to undefeated Sac, and some other upsets for bubble teams.

    In fact Cal Poly might be who I'm rooting for the hardest this weekend, that might eliminate Montana from the bubble
  • Week 9: Cal Poly (1-6) @ UC Davis (3-4) Battle for the Golden Horseshoe
    As long as we continue to be unranked, I reluctantly say run up the score. Unlike most blowouts we actually have something to gain by adding a few TDs
  • Week 9: Cal Poly (1-6) @ UC Davis (3-4) Battle for the Golden Horseshoe
    Side note, I’d put this as one of the best and tightest haltime shows since the band reformation, minus the intentionally bad puns.


    The bands past and current excel when they’re doing something recognizable but not overplayed or stereotypically marching band things, and so things like Ghostbusters and Rocky Horror nail that vibe
  • Week 9: Cal Poly (1-6) @ UC Davis (3-4) Battle for the Golden Horseshoe
    ↪Toke69
    I thought Doss is #1
  • Week 9: Cal Poly (1-6) @ UC Davis (3-4) Battle for the Golden Horseshoe
    Fielding Three guys who can and do take snaps and throw passes in on the same red zone package is killer against these —well, not top FCS defenses
  • Week 9: Cal Poly (1-6) @ UC Davis (3-4) Battle for the Golden Horseshoe
    Curiously, despite our concerns on here about the reliance on the run game and short passes, UCD is now 16th in the nation in yards per play (slightly ahead of Sac, NDSU, and Jackson State for example).

    Aggies are actually creeping up there in a lot of stats, especially offensive and penalty related stats, and you can start to see why the ratings like Massey and Sagarin think this is a top 25 team based on performance vs the schedule

    Edit for more examples:
    Total Offense - #11
    Fewest Penalties Per Game - #3
    Passing Offense - #13
    Completion Percentage - #9
    Rushing Offense - #28
    Yards/Rush - #12
    Turnover Margin - #3
  • Week 8: Big Sky Schedule and Scores
    ↪Kerberos
    Position in bracket is irrelevant if you're not in the top 8, as I understand it. Having a cushion against other bubble teams is the "only" benefit to having more wins if you're not a 1 or 2-loss team already. (A huge benefit though).

    Agree it's a virtual lock that somebody else (likely MSU) gets the auto-bid.
  • Week 8: Big Sky Schedule and Scores
    ↪Kerberos
    That's what I was just thinking. Sac State losing here makes a conference title marginally more doable but that's out of our control anyway. Sac winning here puts us in a better playoff situation.

    Although, I'm guessing we're a lock at 7-4 if Sac is halfway decent by the time we play them.There would have to be serious time zone bias by the committee to not pick a 7-win team with our schedule.
  • Week 8: Aggies (2-4) at Northern Colorado (2-5)
    ↪Riveraggie
    Defense was on the field a lot because the O was scoring so fast; I'm wondering if there's a "sweet spot" where a slightly better opponent might have somewhat fewer (or at least not proportionally more) rushing yards vs a fresher Aggie D and/or against the starters for longer in the game.
  • Week 8: Aggies (2-4) at Northern Colorado (2-5)
    Nope. 75-yard TD for LL on first play
  • Week 8: Aggies (2-4) at Northern Colorado (2-5)
    They finally get a TD, presumably on our backups.

    Time to see Dixon on our next drive maybe? (Or get Tompkins some reps)
  • Week 8: Aggies (2-4) at Northern Colorado (2-5)
    Our rushing corps is having a party out there
  • Week 8: Aggies (2-4) at Northern Colorado (2-5)
    ↪CA Forever
    I just do not understand decisions like that. It barely moves the needle in terms of chance of victory and it isn't even guaranteed 3, as we just saw.
  • Week 8: Aggies (2-4) at Northern Colorado (2-5)
    Huh, an I formation in a post-Gould Era Big Sky game, now I've seen everything
  • Week 8: Aggies (2-4) at Northern Colorado (2-5)
    Hastings is trending to his usual statline where he doesn't look explosive but has a tremendous completion percentage and no picks.

    Good enough to win handily when the defense is generating turnovers to give good field position
  • Week 8: Aggies (2-4) at Northern Colorado (2-5)
    ↪CA Forever
    Who needs offense?
  • Week 8: Aggies (2-4) at Northern Colorado (2-5)
    ↪NCagalum
    Tompkins is suited up today, I noticed. Not sure how many snaps he'll get but I was mildly surprised to not see him once they were within the 5.
Home » Zander
More Comments

Zander

Start FollowingSend a Message
  • About
  • Comments
  • Discussions
  • Uploads
  • Terms of Service
  • Useful Hints and Tips
  • Sign In
  • Created with PlushForums
  • © 2025 Aggie Sports Talk