According to AI:

"UC Davis's Aggie Stadium has a capacity of 10,743 spectators. The stadium features fixed seating on the east and west sides, as well as grass berms in the end zones, providing the official capacity of 10,743."

17,217 was in attendance. At what number would the fire marshal say it's too high?

I don't recall a football game where neither team has attempted a field goal.

Time of possession must be lopsided.

I missed the touchdown since I thought he was taken down earlier. I'm glad I was wrong!

Wrong thread. Deleted.

My fondest memory was the Aggie message board at that time. I found our previous board, but that went up to around 2007. If anyone can find the older board, then that would be fun to read.

Anyway, we were transitioning to Division I. I think we were 1-2 and lost to New Hampshire before the Stanford game. I'm not going to check my facts right now, so feel free to correct me.

However, the Aggie message board group was cautiously optimistic. Even I thought we had a 10% chance of upsetting Stanford since our team showed signs of hope.

I recall one outside poster vigorously mocking us for being optimistic and said he'll come back to the message board to mock us even more after Stanford wins. After we won, he deleted his post. I wanted to save his post so bad!

Does anyone have a future schedule update for Sacramento State for the 2026-2027 season? I'm curious what their schedule would look like after transitioning to FBS.

How often do 7-5 teams make the playoffs?

Because of this great disparity, I'm strongly against playing any P4 school. That game was not fun to watch at all. Because we're apparently poor, we need the money to play these games.

This is one person's take on the Top 766:

Interesting tidbits:
Washington #29
North Dakota State #40. Damn!
Tarleton State #78 and #2 in FCS
UC Davis #141 and #16 in FCS
Sacramento State #177 and #42 in FCS

28.5 point spread seems too conservative.

This is a good reason where I hate watching games where the opponent is favored to win by at least 25 points.

They're good.

I thought The Wave was invented in Oakland.

This is what AI says:

The Wave was invented by professional cheerleader "Krazy George" Henderson at an Oakland Athletics playoff game in Oakland, California, on October 15, 1981. Henderson perfected the wave during earlier events, including a hockey game in 1980 in Denver, Colorado, and an Edmonton, Canada game the same year. The first documented and televised use of the wave was during the A's game, which became the event that launched the wave's widespread popularity.

Edit:

AI also says this:

Though Henderson's wave was the first documented version, the University of Washington also claims a version of the wave at Husky Stadium on Halloween 1981. However, the side-to-side motion seen globally today is widely attributed to Henderson's 1981 A's game.

Washington has only won their last 21 home games. We have a chance!

I really hate the "CA" logo. If it takes considerable time to explain to someone what "CA" stands for, then it's really bad marketing. I wish UC Davis bans that logo.

Yeah. If one factors collectives, then I presume non-football schools like UCSD, UCI, and UCSB should perform significantly better than a typical mid-major non-football school.

I'm curious if UCSD's success is sustainable since their head coach left followed by some players via the portal. I haven't paid attention to their recruitment since then.

I don't know if UCSD will be an 800 pound gorilla when there are still three schools in the top 100 in St. Mary's, USF, and Santa Clara. The WCC will be a nice conference with the addition of UCI and UCSB.

Here comes the rumors. JY also said TV said no for UCI and UCSB/UCR to MW.