I just don't understand what donors would continue to part ways with their cash only to see the athletes turn around and leave. I just don't get it. That happens only one time and that wallet is closed. Now, schools like Davis make a little more sense, granted their retention rate is higher, but still. I'll bet we have 2, maybe 3 years of this before big donors (at other schools especially) throw in the towel.
The real question is, say someone enters the portal and doesn't get the interest they want, and they want to come back to UCD. Do they get welcomed back with open arms or is that a closed door? What sort of message does that send to the team?
Re: Pinnick trip to colorado
The MW is a decent target, but it may not look the same in 5-10 years (our window to move into it). Being methodical and cautious is what we will do, but having goals to play in higher quality conferences cannot hurt. Heck, we have comparable budgets to some MW teams currently. Why not shoot to get more revenue back from the conference?
I feel like it's gotta be roll with the young bucks because Plough's system is difficult to master at a championship level with only a spring and fall camp under the belt.