Well defense optional both sides on first drives.

14-7 Sac at the end of the first quarter.

Sac's offense is #13 in the FCS and North Dakota's defense is #113. I think we would have run all over ND.

In my humble opinion, its looking like Sac might roll UND......Davis would have as well. Davis probably scores more points in doing so.

The Davis defense being the major difference between Sac and Davis. The committee really slept on Davis, as we appear to be the more well-rounded team.

UND looks like they should have been left out. Wow.

The committee really slept on Davis. — SochorField

Agree...Sac appears that they may well romp over ND and, if that happens, the committee's decision to leave the Aggies out yet again, looks even worse.

How about the whack committe member who said quality losses don't count, and then said they did... which puts salt in the wound of our Aggies 2022 snub.

I think EWU and Weber being crappy really hurt the BSC and prevented the conf. from having 5 teams in, whether it was us as the 5th team or not.
Beating a dead horse here, but losing to NAU was the killer.

yes Davis defense better than Sac’s. Bennett and overall team spread very noticeable compared to UND. UND defense doesn’t have the team speed of Aggie defense.

Spread or speed?

Beating a dead horse here, but losing to NAU was the killer. — SochorField

NAU was a better team than their record. They had some "bad loses" but they also beat Montana and Weber and came only lost to Sac by 1 point in a game they" coulda, shoulda have won." However, we lost to NAU by 17 and that stood out like a sore thumb.

28-14 Sac at the half.

speed as in velocity :-). Fatfingered it.

Wondering if Sac is going to mentally go south once again as UND ties it up?

It looks like it. ND is rolling now. 28-28 at the end of the 3rd.

I'm rooting for UND. Suprised Sac got out to a hot start as you'd think the 10am start time would have favored North Dakota.

UND up by a TD.

Sorry meant to type Sac State...

How did Slack score?

rushing TD at the UND 4.
edit: 4
sorry following too many games.

North Dakota announcer said “Sac State has a tendency to quit when things are not going well”. He prefaced it with “I probably shouldn’t say this but ….. I’m going to”.

Hornets win 42-35, now face a very tough task.

Losing to a 5-6 team that wasn't EWU by 17 was the low point of the season.

Can't help but think Davis would have scored 42 as well, but held UND to 17-21

darn, Sac pulls it off. This is not good for the Ags.

Will the Hornets stay in the Dakotas? Why travel back and forth?

I'm glad that Sac won. It's good for the Big Sky and it makes our win over the Hornets look even better. Kaden Bennett is a heck of a good QB for Sac.

I'm super curious too. Plus this is Sac State, it's not like they care about finals and studying.

If anyone finds out what Sac States does regarding travel to the next game, I'd love to know.

Watching Delaware Lafayette. I would like to see Davis play Delaware some time, since Delaware was a D2 or college division power in the 70s when Davis started to enter the rankings.
Surprising they only have 4,000 something in attendance for a playoff game.

Some schools might draw less on the holiday weekend than others? Honestly no idea.

Sac State has a tough schedule to start next year @SJSU AND Fresno but their BS Conference schedule is a joke, they only play Montana State away and play the usually "bad" teams like Portland State, ISU, Northern Colorado etc.

Richmond 49 North Carolina Central 27 - Final
Delaware 36 Lafayette 34 - Final