I know he had some trouble seeing the field in his career because of leg injury, that might've messed up his window to play more often, played in 7 games last year - speed to cover? Certainly length to match up with tight ends
Certainly was fast enough before he got hurt to start a bunch of games, make a lot of tackles and multiple interceptions in the ACC. Hopefully he's fully recovered by this point.
Batson reportedly had an upper body jnjury. He was great until he got injured, which finished him for that year. He came back the following but he had been replaced and maybe not 100%. Supposedly 100% now.
He was a free safety.
My guess, uninformed, and almost surely wrong is that our lineup looks like this 3-3-5
DL Carrade ?
NG Porter ( porter can reportedly play anywhere on the D-line, so we could play a bigger nose guard if desired)
DE Psyk
LB Porter Connors
LB Rutchena
Rush Goligoski ?
Boundary Safety Rex
Field Safety Batson
Nickel Riddick
Corner Allen
Other corner lots of candidates but i’ll guess Ty Richardson the transfer from Tufts.
I thought maybe either Stanley/Fowler would start because they both played pretty significantly last year. I can see Batson starting for sure....all three of them definitely playing a lot
Preview. Weird that they only name Psyk, Rutchena and Ty Richardson out of our grad transfers.
Davis wouldn’t be a top 15 preseason team without players that don’t get a mention in this video, Derrell Porter, Riddick, Batson, and Allen.
It would be interesting to know if the coaches doing these previews are so lackadaisical about the effort that they do it off the cuff and leave out the transfer safeties and nose guard or whether that part of their response ended up cut out, or whether the transfers looked so unimpressive that they aren’t worth mentioning. I’m leaning towards lackadaisical.
From study I want to believe that this Aggie front line is one of the best in history. Not overly huge but very strong intelligent and extremely mobile. But I have never really understood the concept of the 3 man front. I know that many teams have used it and still do but I still don’t get it. Please help me understand. All other aspects of the defense looks pretty solid to me. Your views appreciated.
I'd say a 3 man front allows for more flexibility and speed on defense.
3 linemen, 2 LB and 5 Defensive backs + a "rover" like Goligoski for instance who can drop into coverage as a LB or move up and rush on any given play.
Ex-Aggies, or pro ballers / coaches feel free to educate!
The idea behind having a three man line is you have moved a player off the line of scrimmage so he is harder to block and can move laterally. Teams started to go that route when there were a lot of option offenses in the 70’s. It was effective against the run.
The “new” approach is the 3-3-5, which removes a player from the traditional front seven, and provides a fifth defensive back. They went to that to counter the numerous receivers in spread offenses, they have five DBs to cover 5 potential receivers.
They can play one of the linebackers at or near the line of scrimmage, as essentially a defensive end, so in effect they can have four linemen if they want. It is harder for the offense to anticipate what the defense is going to do, which is probably the key thing. Lots of players can potentially blitz.
I think the Aggie offensive line is one of the better ones in D1 history. The defensive line has a a lot of turnover from last season. Transfers and non-starters form last year taking over.